Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2018

Hilton's Registration Can Stay In Canada Even Though Guests Cannot

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.
Contributor
Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

At Fross Zelnick, we secure and defend our clients’ most valuable assets—their brands, designs, and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.

The Federal Court of Canada confirmed that trademark owners can provide "hotel services" in Canada without operating a hotel.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP v. Miller Thomson LLP, 2018 FC 895.

The Federal Court of Canada confirmed that trademark owners can provide "hotel services" in Canada without operating a hotel. Instead, ancillary hotel services provided over the Internet can constitute trademark use as long as Canadians receive a "meaningful benefit" from them.

The decision came in Hilton Worldwide Holding LLP v. Miller Thomson LLP. The Canadian Trademark Opposition Board ("TOB") cancelled Hilton's Canadian registration for WALDORF-ASTORIA covering hotel services at Miller Thomson's request because Hilton did not operate a hotel by that name in Canada. Instead, it operated a website—accessible to Canadians—that allowed thousands of Canadian users to make hotel reservations, claim discounts, and exercise loyalty rewards.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from