Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2005

Experimental Use Exception To Patent Infringement In Canada

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Significant research and development is conducted in Canada, especially in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, there has been much interest in a recent United States decision on experimental activity in the context of potential liability for patent infringement and the corresponding position in Canada.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Article by Sheldon Burshtein, ©2005 Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Intellectual Property, October 2005.

Significant research and development is conducted in Canada, especially in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries. Therefore, there has been much interest in a recent United States decision on experimental activity in the context of potential liability for patent infringement and the corresponding position in Canada.

United States Decision

In a much anticipated decision, the United States Supreme Court held that the use of a patented compound in preclinical studies is exempt from patent infringement where there is a reasonable basis for believing that the compound could be the subject of a regulatory filing to the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) or where the experiment may produce information for use in a USFDA submission: Merck v. Integra Lifesciences. Merck funded research by the Scripps

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from