Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 APRIL 2024

Don't Get Caught By Canada's Patent Novelty Grace-Period

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

Patent applicants need to be aware of a subtle, but key difference between Canada and other jurisdictions like the United States when relying on the grace-period for inventor disclosures.

CanadaIntellectual Property

Patent applicants need to be aware of a subtle, but key difference between Canada and other jurisdictions like the United States when relying on the grace-period for inventor disclosures.

For an invention to be patentable, it must be new, useful, and non-obvious. To be new, the invention generally must not be publicly known at the time the patent application is filed, which includes not having been publicly disclosed by the inventor. However, certain jurisdictions, such as Canada and the United States, have a one-year grace period to file a patent application if an inventor discloses their invention.

The grace period typically allows an inventor to publicly disclose their invention, for example by selling their invention, and not be barred from patenting their invention for one-year after the disclosure. However, there is one key difference between the Canadian and United States grace periods when claiming priority in a patent application.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from