Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JANUARY 2026

AI: Is Patenting Really The Right Move? - Factor III

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

This article forms one part of a broader decision framework for evaluating whether patent or trade secret protection is appropriate for AI innovation.

CanadaIntellectual Property

This article forms one part of a broader decision framework for evaluating whether patent or trade secret protection is appropriate for AI innovation.

The framework is designed to help decision-makers (e.g., innovators, in house, CTOs) align patent and IP strategy with underlying business realities and moving beyond purely "legal" considerations.

Reproducibility considers whether a competitor could realistically replicate the AI innovation by reviewing your public materials or otherwise by obtaining limited access to the system itself.

If the core functionality can be inferred or reverse-engineered from these sources, trade secrets are of little value since the innovation is readily discoverable. In these cases, patent protection may be more useful to prevent straightforward copying.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from