Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JUNE 2018

A Cautionary Tale - University Of Alberta v. Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FCA 36

Earlier this year the Federal Court of Appeal released a decision showing that, unfortunately, it can.

CanadaIntellectual Property

At one time a non-inventor applicant for a Canadian patent needed to record an assignment or other evidence to show how it derived its rights in the invention from the inventor. Now, it need only submit an unsigned declaration stating that it is the legal representative of the inventor. The procedure has been made so simple one might expect that nothing could go wrong. Earlier this year the Federal Court of Appeal released a decision showing that, unfortunately, it can.

The present case came before the Federal Court when the University of Alberta sought judicial review in respect of certain actions taken by the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) relating to a patent application in which the University had acquired an interest. The original applicants derived their rights in the invention from the named inventors. However, the applicants did not submit a declaration that they were the legal representatives of the inventors, as required by paragraph

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from