Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JANUARY 2014

York University, Religious Accommodation, And The Absence Of Bright Lines

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

York University caused much controversy earlier this month by agreeing that a male student was not required to meet with female class members in connection with a group project.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

York University caused much controversy earlier this month by agreeing that a male student was not required to meet with female class members in connection with a group project. While the male student's reason for the request was apparently based on a religious belief,1 the university's decision was based on the fact that the course was advertised to be an online course with no in-person participation required; as such, the student was not required to participate in any way in the group project.

Notwithstanding this explanation, a furor erupted over York University's decision. Justice Minister Peter MacKay commented that "This is what we've tried to combat in places like Afghanistan". A Globe and Mail columnist declared "I expected this back in Iran, not at York University". The professor at the heart of the matter – who originally refused the student's request – said that to accommodate would make the university an "accessory to sexism".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from