Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2024

SCC Upholds Self-governing First Nation's Residency Requirement For Elected Councillors

MLT Aikins LLP
MLT Aikins LLP
Contributor
MLT Aikins LLP

MLT Aikins LLP

FIRM OVERVIEW MLT Aikins is a full-service business law firm of more than 375 lawyers with a deep...

View firm profile
Explore more from MLT Aikins LLP

Charter applies to Nation but Section 25 gives collective rights primacy over individual rights.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

Charter applies to Nation but Section 25 gives collective rights primacy over individual rights.

On March 28, 2024, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Dickson v Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation. The Court dismissed Cindy Dickson's Charter challenge to the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation (VGFN) requirement that Chief and Council reside on the Nation's settlement lands.

The SCC's decision was split three ways. Five out of seven justices agreed that Ms. Dickson's appeal should be dismissed but came to that conclusion in different ways. The majority decided that the Charter applied to VGFN's government but that the residency requirement was protected by section 25 of the Charter. Section 25 protected the VGFN government's collective right to require that their Chief and Council reside in their traditional territory – a practice which is rooted in Vuntut Gwitchin culture and tradition.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from