Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 NOVEMBER 2011

Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v Canada (Attorney General)

The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously held that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ("the Tribunal") does not have the authority to award legal costs.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

2011 SCC 53 (Released October 28, 2011)

Administrative Law – Remedial Jurisdiction – Canadian Human Rights Act – Legal Costs – Standard of Review – Statutory Interpretation

The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously held that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ("the Tribunal") does not have the authority to award legal costs.

The applicant, Donna Mowatt, was compulsorily released from her position as a traffic technician for the Canadian Forces. Following her release, Ms. Mowatt filed a complaint with the Canadian Human Rights Commission ("the Commission"), alleging sexual harassment, adverse differential treatment, and failure to continue to employ her on the basis of her sex. In addition to awarding $4,000 plus interest for suffering, the Tribunal considered conflicting Federal Court jurisprudence and concluded that it had the authority to award legal costs pursuant to s. 53(2) of the Canada Human Rights Act ("the Act"), which allows the Tribunal to compensate

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from