Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JUNE 2007

True Leases Caught By Ontario PPSA

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Since the introduction of the PPSA in Ontario in 1976, the issue of whether a lease is a true lease or a security lease has generated more litigation and controversy than any other specific issue under the PPSA. How a lease is ultimately characterized can have serious consequences.

CanadaFinance and Banking

Article by Michael Burke, © 2007, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Financial Services, May 2007

Since the introduction of the PPSA in Ontario in 1976, the issue of whether a lease is a true lease or a security lease has generated more litigation and controversy than any other specific issue under the PPSA. How a lease is ultimately characterized can have serious consequences. If the lease is a true lease, then that lease is completely outside the scope of the PPSA. If the lease is a security lease in the sense that it secures the payment or performance of an obligation, then that lease falls completely within the scope of the PPSA. Unfortunately, unlike the Uniform Commercial Code, the PPSA provides virtually no guidance on when a lease will be considered to be a under the PPSA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from