Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 MAY 2016

Sharing Is Caring … Or Maybe Not? Ontario Judge Refuses To Approve A Class Action Fee Sharing Agreement

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

On May 25, 2016, the Court of Appeal for Ontario will hear the appeal in Bancroft-Snell v Visa Canada Corporation...

CanadaFinance and Banking

On May 25, 2016, the Court of Appeal for Ontario will hear the appeal in Bancroft-Snell v Visa Canada Corporation, where Justice Perell held that a fee sharing agreement between class counsel and another law firm that had commenced rival class action proceedings was "unauthorized, unenforceable, and possibly illegal [para. 64]".

By way of background, a consortium of law firms ("Class Counsel") commenced class proceedings in 2011 in several provinces, including Ontario, on behalf of a proposed national class against MasterCard International Incorporated, Visa Canada Corporation and most of the major financial institutions in Canada (collectively, the "Defendants"). It was alleged that the Defendants engaged in a price-fixing conspiracy in respect of the "merchant discount fees" that apply to retailers on Visa and MasterCard transactions. A few years after Class Counsel had commenced the British Columbia action, but before they had issued claims in Alberta and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from