Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 APRIL 2017

Mortgage Fraud: Who Has Priority In A Dispute?

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

A recent Ontario Divisional Court decision, CIBC Mortgages Inc. v Computershare Trust Company of Canada, confirms that a mortgage lender may lose priority if their mortgage is fraudulently discharged by the mortgagor.

CanadaFinance and Banking

A recent Ontario Divisional Court decision, CIBC Mortgages Inc. v Computershare Trust Company of Canada, 2016 ONSC 7094 (CanLII)1 ("Computershare"), confirms that a mortgage lender may lose priority if their mortgage is fraudulently discharged by the mortgagor. As a result, mortgage lenders may wish to implement a system to monitor whether their mortgages remain registered on title to a mortgaged property.

In the facts resulting in the Computershare decision, the homeowners had provided a purchase money mortgage in the amount of $280,801 to Computershare when they purchased the property in December, 2006. In August, 2009, the homeowners caused an unauthorized party to register a fraudulent discharge of the Computershare mortgage. However, Computershare was not aware of this because the homeowners continued to make mortgage payments to Computershare as usual until January, 2013.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from