Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 SEPTEMBER 2008

Is it Disclosable? The Material Fact vs. Material Change Debate

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

The issue of whether something is a “material change” or a “material fact” has often been a thorny issue for public companies and their advisers.

CanadaFinance and Banking

The issue of whether something is a material change or a material fact has often been a thorny issue for public companies and their advisers. If it is a material change, the issuer has an immediate disclosure obligation. Material facts are not, generally, required to be publicly disclosed as they occur (although the TSX does, absent confidentiality concerns, require their immediate disclosure).

While it is often a relatively simple task to determine whether any particular thing is a material change or a material fact, certain events, occurrences and developments are not so easily characterized. The distinction is not without serious consequences for issuers and their counsel. Two recent decisions have helped to clarify when a material change can be said to have occurred, providing greater certainty to those operating in the public markets.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from