Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JULY 2023

Creditors May Invalidate Debtor Fraudulent Transfers Occurring Long Before Any Debtor-Creditor Relationship Established

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The Ontario Court of Appeal ("ONCA") in Ontario Securities Commission v Camerlengo Holdings Inc. has arguably expanded the scope of what may be a fraudulent conveyance under s. 2 of the Fraudulent...

CanadaFinance and Banking

Introduction

The Ontario Court of Appeal ("ONCA") in Ontario Securities Commission v Camerlengo Holdings Inc.1 has arguably expanded the scope of what may be a fraudulent conveyance under s. 2 of the Fraudulent Conveyances Act ("FCA"). The FCA gives a court the discretion to invalidate transfers of property carried out to avoid effective enforcement by creditors and contingent creditors. In its decision, the ONCA ruled that a creditor may still pursue the invalidation of a transaction as a fraudulent conveyance under the FCA even if the creditor had no commercial or contractual relationship with the debtor at the time that the debtor had effected a transfer to insulate their assets or property.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from