Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 NOVEMBER 2026

Beyond True Sale: Can A CCAA Court Allocate Additional Restructuring Costs To Securitization Parties?

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In Pride Group Holdings Inc. et al., 2026 ONSC 4700 (“Pride Group”), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) held that securitization parties whose assets were expressly excluded from the debtor’s “Property” under a CCAA proceeding could not be compelled to contribute additional funds toward the debtor’s restructuring costs, beyond any amounts already paid by them. While the decision is currently under appeal, it nonetheless provides important guidance to market participants.

CanadaFinance and Banking

In Pride Group Holdings Inc. et al., 2026 ONSC 4700 (“Pride Group”), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) held that securitization parties whose assets were expressly excluded from the debtor’s “Property” under a CCAA proceeding could not be compelled to contribute additional funds toward the debtor’s restructuring costs, beyond any amounts already paid by them. While the decision is currently under appeal, it nonetheless provides important guidance to market participants.

The decision addresses a risk that is difficult to price at closing: the possibility that costs arising from an originator’s insolvency could migrate back into an otherwise bankruptcy-remote structure through cost allocation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from