Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2015

Amendments To Ontario's Conflict Of Laws Rules Will Require Changes To Documentation And Registration/Search Practices

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Under each of the Personal Property Security Acts in force across Canada (other than in Quebec), there are different conflict of laws rules that apply to the validity, perfection, priority and enforcement of security interests...

CanadaFinance and Banking

Secured parties that make loans on the security of receivables and motor vehicles, that purchase receivables under securitization or factoring arrangements or that provide financing pursuant to motor vehicle leases or conditional sale agreements (each, a Secured Party) will need to take proactive action as a result of amendments to the Personal Property Security Act (Ontario), which come into force on December 31, 2015.

On that date, the amendments will introduce new rules for determining where a debtor is deemed to be located when applying the Ontario conflict of laws rule that is most relevant to such Secured Parties. These amendments will require that changes be made to such Secured Parties' registration and search practices and that their documentation be reviewed and, if necessary, revised to ensure that the representations and covenants in their documentation are broad enough to deal with these new rules.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from