Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 SEPTEMBER 2012

Residence Of A Trust

Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP
Explore more from Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP

The Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled that, for income tax purposes, a trust (like a corporation) resides where its central control and management is located.

CanadaFamily and Matrimonial
Alexander Holburn Beaudin & Lang LLP
Alexander Holburn Beaudin & Lang LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

The Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled that, for income tax purposes, a trust (like a corporation) resides where its central control and management is located.  This case is referred to as Fundy Settlement.  Prior to Fundy Settlement, the leading case (Thibodeau) held that a trust is resident where a majority of the trustees reside. 

After Fundy Settlement, it is clear the taxation authorities and the court will not accept the residence of the majority of the trustees as being determinative.  The taxation authorities and the courts will want to know where the central control and management of the trust is located.  If the trustees of the trust administer the trust and follow instructions from a beneficiary, a protector, a settlor, or some other non-trustee, then the taxation authorities and the courts will likely find that the trust is resident where the central controller or manager is located. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from