Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 SEPTEMBER 2019

What Should You Know About The Coming Into Force Of The Impact Assessment Act?

Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Explore more from Fogler, Rubinoff LLP

As of the end of August 2019, Canada has a new environmental assessment regime — the Impact Assessment Act. Concurrent with the coming into force of

CanadaEnvironment
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

As of the end of August 2019, Canada has a new environmental assessment regime — the Impact Assessment Act. Concurrent with the coming into force of the Act were two important regulations. The Physical Activities Regulations designate proposed projects which the Impact Assessment Agency will have to consider for assessment. The Information and Management of Time Limits Regulations sets out the information proponents must include in the initial and more detailed project description and the time frames during the initial planning phase and subsequent stages of the assessment. This description now specifically requires estimates of any greenhouse gas and other emissions and wastes associated with any phase of the project.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Amendments Streamline Project List Under Impact Assessment Act

The Government of Canada has amended regulations under the Impact Assessment Act to streamline environmental reviews for major infrastructure projects, particularly interprovincial pipelines. These changes shift regulatory responsibility for certain energy projects to the Canada Energy Regulator while removing other project types from federal review following the Supreme Court's 2024 constitutional ruling.
CanadaEnvironment
MLT Aikins LLP
MLT Aikins LLP
Article

Federal Government Removes Certain Energy Projects From The Impact Assessment Act Project List

The Canadian government has removed seven types of energy projects from federal impact assessment requirements, shifting review responsibilities to the Canada Energy Regulator and provincial processes. This regulatory change affects pipelines, electrical transmission lines, oil sands facilities, and power plants, fundamentally altering how major energy infrastructure projects will be evaluated and approved across Canada.
CanadaEnvironment
McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Article

Canadian Product Stewardship And EPR: 2026 Summer Update

Canadian governments and producer-responsibility organizations are refining extended producer responsibility programs across the country, affecting packaging, batteries, electronics, and hazardous products. Recent regulatory changes include expanded collection obligations, adjusted compliance timelines, and new enforcement measures, with significant developments in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, and Atlantic provinces.
CanadaEnvironment
Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Article

Ontario Invites Expressions Of Interest For Licences Under The Geologic Carbon Storage Act

Ontario has launched its first call for expressions of interest in carbon capture and storage licences under the new Geologic Carbon Storage Act, targeting Crown-owned pore space beneath lakebeds surrounding the Ontario Peninsula. The detailed submission requirements reveal expectations that proponents have advanced well beyond initial planning stages, with the process serving as a critical test of Ontario's emerging CCS framework and its attractiveness to industry.
CanadaEnvironment
Torys
Torys
Article

Update: Bare Trust Reporting Rules For 2026

The federal government has finalized revised reporting rules for bare trusts, significantly narrowing the original requirements. While bare trusts are generally exempt from filing for 2023-2025, certain arrangements involving separated legal and beneficial ownership will face new filing obligations starting with the 2026 taxation year, with specific exemptions for family trusts, joint ownership arrangements, and principal residences.
CanadaTax
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Article

CSA Publishes Final Amendments To Align Non-GAAP Financial Measures Disclosure Requirements With IFRS 18

The Canadian Securities Administrators have finalized amendments to National Instrument 52-112 to address the introduction of IFRS 18, which introduces management-defined performance measures requiring disclosure in financial statement notes. These amendments ensure that measures historically treated as non-GAAP financial measures remain subject to regulatory disclosure requirements when disclosed outside financial statements...
CanadaAccounting and Audit
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Article

Ontario Court Of Appeal: Using The Words “at Any Time” Or “for Any Reason” In A Without Cause Termination Provision Does Not Breach The Employment Standards Act, 2000 (“ESA”)

The Ontario Court of Appeal has issued a landmark ruling on employment termination provisions, addressing whether contractual language permitting termination "at any time" or "for any reason" violates the Employment Standards Act. This decision overturns a controversial lower court ruling and provides crucial clarity for employers drafting termination clauses. The court emphasized a practical, contextual approach to interpreting employment contracts rather than isolating specific phrases.
CanadaEmployment and HR
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Article

Court Of Appeal Clarifies Law On Mitigating Damages In Wrongful Dismissal Claims

The Ontario Court of Appeal has established new clarity on employer obligations in wrongful dismissal cases, addressing both the burden of proof for mitigation efforts and the treatment of income earned during notice periods. This ruling in Williamson v Brandt Tractor Inc. resolves critical questions about when employers must demonstrate available comparable employment and how courts should handle mitigation income from lower-paying positions.
CanadaEmployment and HR
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP