Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 APRIL 2009

Provincial Regulation Of Fish Farms Ruled Unconstitutional

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In the landmark decision of “Morton v. British Columbia (Agriculture and Lands)” (9 February 2009) the British Columbia Supreme Court held that the Government of British Columbia had no jurisdiction to regulate fish farms throughout the province and declared that the authority to do so was vested solely in the federal government, under section 91(12) of the “Constitution Act”, 1867.

CanadaEnvironment

In the landmark decision of Morton v. British Columbia (Agriculture and Lands) (9 February 2009) the British Columbia Supreme Court held that the Government of British Columbia had no jurisdiction to regulate fish farms throughout the province and declared that the authority to do so was vested solely in the federal government, under section 91(12) of the Constitution Act, 1867.

The constitutional challenge arose in response to the provincial government's decision to renew a fish farm license of Marine Harvest Inc. Canada, which operates a twenty-hectare fish farm containing approximately 600,000 Atlantic salmon in the Broughton Archipelago, off the coast of British Columbia. The petitioners, environmental activists, alleged that the license should not have been renewed because of the environmental damage caused by fish farms, including the proliferation of sea lice, chemical waste, and diseases in surrounding waters, and the disruption of migratory routes of Pacific

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from