Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JULY 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Workplace Harassment: The Employer's Responsibility In The Modern World

In the recent decision Metrolinx v Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1587 ("Metrolinx"), the Ontario Court of Appeal addressed workplace harassment in the digital age.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In the recent decision Metrolinx v Amalgamated Transit Union, Local 1587 ("Metrolinx"), the Ontario Court of Appeal addressed workplace harassment in the digital age. In doing so, the court clarified the scope of the employer's statutory duty to investigate workplace harassment imposed by the Occupational Health and Safety Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. O.1 (the "OHSA"). While the courts rarely overturn awards granted by labour arbitrators, the court found the Arbitrator's award to be unreasonable after being subjected to judicial review.

Background: Quashing the Unreasonable Arbitration Award

In April 2021, five Metrolinx employees were terminated for sexual harassment after the company became aware of screenshots from the employees' private WhatsApp group chat. The screenshots were sent to a female Metrolinx employee who was targeted in the screenshot by comments suggesting she had performed sexual favours for her professional development.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from