The benefit provides $2,000 per month of taxable income to eligible workers in Canada.

A front-seated passenger who unexpectedly grabbed the wheel of a vehicle, causing an accident, is considered to have operated the vehicle without the driver's consent.

The Justice Services Online platform allows Ontarians, and their legal counsel, to e-file documents related to civil actions or applications or family proceedings.

In Pham v. Qualified Metal Fabricators Ltd. 2023 ONCA 255, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that employers could no longer rely on the argument that an employee...

Power was ultimately restored without any intervention required on the part of appellant or the mall owner.

The case of Cargill Inc. v. ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Case No. 250703456, is of interest for certain coverage disputes in Canada. It was filed in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia on July 31, 2025.

The case of Cargill Inc. v. ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Co., Case No. 250703456, is of interest for certain coverage disputes in Canada. It was filed in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia on July 31, 2025.

Amelia's injuries arose from the impaired driver's use of the vehicle.

The Court of Appeal released a new decision on dependency in a priority dispute between Intact and Allstate, linked below.

Complaints about civil jury trials in motor vehicle cases are not novel or uncommon. It is the perception of some (most notably the plaintiff bar) that jury results are typically unfavourable to plaintiffs.

As the access to and use of marijuana becomes increasingly legitimate and common, it is reasonable to assume that the businesses that operate within this environment will experience significant legal "growing pains".

In Mohammed v The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, the Ontario Court of Appeal clarified the meaning of material fact to include criminal activities 20 years prior to obtaining life insurance.

A receiver can sue on a contract yet disclaim the contract's arbitration clause, determined the BCCA in Petrowest Corporation v. Peace River Hydro Partners 2020 BCCA 339.

ONSC Judge expands the utility of summary judgement motions.

The decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Joo v Tran highlights the significant peril a purchaser of land can suffer when they fail to close based on an alleged failure by the seller to fulfill...

On June 28, 2016, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation (the Ministry) made an announcement that has significant implications for both the trucking and insurance industry.

On January 1, 2023, the statutory deductibles and corresponding monetary thresholds in motor vehicle accident claims increased significantly by 6.9% due to inflation.

Technology is growing exponentially and new software can become very valuable. What happens when one of your employees creates a competing product to yours which he has access to as part of his employment?...

When a senior software developer secretly creates competing software on his own time, who owns the copyright? The Ontario Court of Appeal's decision in Nexus Solutions Inc. v. Krougly clarifies the boundaries of employer ownership over employee-created work, establishing that broad job descriptions alone cannot secure intellectual property rights without clear contractual terms or direct involvement in the creation process.

The legal profession is a notoriously slow-progressing field. Just a few years ago, one of the primary modes of delivering documents and correspondence, aside from regular mail, was by fax machine