Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2026

When Mitigation Meets Inference: What Employers Can Take From Gugulyn v. Alberta

MLT Aikins LLP
MLT Aikins LLP
Contributor
MLT Aikins LLP

MLT Aikins LLP

FIRM OVERVIEW MLT Aikins is a full-service business law firm of more than 375 lawyers with a deep...

View firm profile
Explore more from MLT Aikins LLP

The recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision in Gugulyn v. Alberta, 2026 ABCA 68 provides a useful reminder for employers navigating mitigation arguments in wrongful or constructive dismissal cases. While the outcome of this case ultimately favoured the employee in several respects, the Court’s reasoning offers practical guidance on how employers can meet their evidentiary burden without complicating their case.

CanadaEmployment and HR

The recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision in Gugulyn v. Alberta, 2026 ABCA 68 provides a useful reminder for employers navigating mitigation arguments in wrongful or constructive dismissal cases. While the outcome of this case ultimately favoured the employee in several respects, the Court’s reasoning offers practical guidance on how employers can meet their evidentiary burden without complicating their case. 

Background 

A long-serving employee of the Government of Alberta was constructively dismissed after being reassigned to a role he believed he was unqualified to perform. He declined the new position and did not return to work. At trial, the Court found he had been constructively dismissed and, was entitled to 23 months’ pay in lieu of notice under the common law. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from