Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 DECEMBER 2018

Weighing Your Options? Reasonable Notice Means Weighing Your Evidence, Count Summary Judgment Out

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

Coffey v Nine Energy Canada Inc. 1, a recent decision of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, confirms that summary judgment is not appropriate to decide an assessment of damages for pay in lieu of reasonable notice.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Coffey v Nine Energy Canada Inc. 1, a recent decision of the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench, confirms that summary judgment is not appropriate to decide an assessment of damages for pay in lieu of reasonable notice. This case was an appeal from Master Farrington's decision2, finding that an assessment of reasonable notice requires the weighing of evidence, which cannot be determined by summary judgment and is outside the jurisdiction of a master. In confirming the Master's decision, the Court concluded that an application should instead be made for summary trial pursuant to Rule 7.5 of the Alberta Rules of Court (the "Rules"), which is more appropriate to determine damages for reasonable notice as it allows a justice to make findings of fact.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from