Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2021

Unmasking Employer Accommodation Obligations And Mutual Frustrations

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

A recent arbitration decision in Unifor Local 333 v Moore Packaging Corporation presents unique factual circumstances related to mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic...

CanadaEmployment and HR

A recent arbitration decision in Unifor Local 333 v Moore Packaging Corporation1 presents unique factual circumstances related to mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic and serves as an important reminder for employers of their accommodation obligations. The decision arose out of two grievances brought by Unifor Local 333 due to the employer's failure to accommodate the grievor's medical disability in a timely way and for ultimately terminating her employment on the basis of frustration of contract.

Background

The grievor was employed as a machine operator at a manufacturing facility in Barrie, when on September 7, 2020 the employer instituted a mandatory masking policy (the “Policy”). The grievor promptly advised the employer she could not wear a mask because of chronic Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”) that made it impossible for her to wear any kind of face-covering for more than a brief period of time. Unfortunately, the PTSD stemmed from the grievor

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from