Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 SEPTEMBER 2018

"Timing Isn't Everything": Termination Shortly After Disability-Related Absences Is Not Necessarily Discriminatory

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

A common issue in human rights claims is the timing of an employer's action or decision relative to an employee's medical leave or illness.

CanadaEmployment and HR

A common issue in human rights claims is the timing of an employer's action or decision relative to an employee's medical leave or illness.  Even where an employer takes action or makes a decision that is unrelated to an employee's protected characteristics under human rights law, the timing often raises questions about the employer's motivations. 

One illustrative decision in this regard is Mou v. MHPM Project Leaders, 2017 HRTO 246, in which the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the "Tribunal") dismissed a complaint based largely on the timing between (a) the employer expressing concerns about the employee's disability-related absences, and (b) the termination of that employee's employment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from