Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2016

The Duty To Mitigate And Its Impact On Damages

Employer clients often ask during a wrongful or constructive dismissal lawsuit what damages may be awarded. One relevant consideration is the common law duty to mitigate.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Employer clients often ask during a wrongful or constructive dismissal lawsuit what damages may be awarded. One relevant consideration is the common law duty to mitigate. A wrongfully dismissed employee has a duty to mitigate his or her damages by attempting to find alternate employment. The question of whether an employee has met his or her duty to mitigate becomes especially relevant in times of economic downturn when employment prospects are sparse. In light of the current Alberta economy now is a good time to remind employers what obligations an employee has following a dismissal without notice.

The most recent Canadian authority on the duty to mitigate remains the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Evans v. Teamsters, Local 31, 2008 SCC 20 ("Evans"). The Supreme Court reaffirmed in Evans an employee's duty to mitigate his or her losses resulting from a wrongful dismissal. There are four important takeaways for employers following Evans:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from