Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 OCTOBER 2025

Signed, Sealed, Unsettled? Lessons From Johnstone v Loblaw

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In a recent decision, Johnstone v. Loblaw, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice rejected a former employee's unilateral attempt to add new terms after a settlement had been reached...

CanadaEmployment and HR

In a recent decision, Johnstone v. Loblaw, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice rejected a former employee's unilateral attempt to add new terms after a settlement had been reached, noting: "Buyer's remorse, a change of heart, or even growing concern about his ability to close his house purchase do not entitle him to renege on a settlement." Below, we highlight the key takeaways from this decision for employers should be aware of.

Background

Mr. Johnstone was employed by Loblaw Companies Limited ("Loblaws") for seven years. On April 11, 2022, he was terminated without cause, shortly after relocating from Winnipeg to Ottawa for work, and while in the process of closing on a new home in Ottawa.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from