Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JANUARY 2017

Recent Cases Confirm Obligations When Holding Former Employees To Non-Competition Covenants

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

Two recent decisions, one from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and another from the B.C. Supreme Court, provide employers with further insight into what is required...

CanadaEmployment and HR

Two recent decisions, one from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and another from the B.C. Supreme Court, provide employers with further insight into what is required if one is to hold a former employee to a non-competition covenant.

United Rentals of Canada Inc. v. Brooks

The first decision, United Rentals of Canada Inc. v. Brooks, involved a delivery company attempting to hold a former driver to a non-competition agreement that had been signed approximately four years after he began working for the company. After Brooks left United to work for a competitor, United sued for breach of the non-competition agreement. In response, Brooks brought a motion for partial summary judgment, arguing that the agreement was unenforceable because he signed it without receiving consideration from United.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from