Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 APRIL 2014

Psychological Harassment: Reining In Duplication Of Proceedings

The Quebec Superior Court held that a decision of the Commission des lésions professionnelles finding operated as "res judicata".

CanadaEmployment and HR

In a judgment handed down on January 27, 2014, the Quebec Superior Court1 held that a decision of the Commission des lésions professionnelles (employment injury review board) finding that there was no workplace harassment operated as res judicata in relation to a complaint filed with the Commission des relations du travail (labour relations board) under section 123.6 of the Act respecting labour standards alleging psychological harassment at work.

This ruling by the Superior Court affirms the imperative of reining in the duplication of proceedings based on the same facts.

The facts

In this case, the worker had filed a claim before the Quebec's Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (CSST) for employment injury allegedly caused by psychological harassment in the workplace. When her claim was rejected, the worker had taken her case to the employment injury review board, the Commission des lésions professionnelle (CLP). On September 29, 2008, the CLP

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from