Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JANUARY 2017

Plain Language In Bonus Plan Prevails: No Employment, No Vesting, No Bonus

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

In positive news for employers, in Styles v Alberta Investment Management Corporation, 2017 ABCA 1, the ABCA affirmed that an employee who does not meet a clear and well drafted condition of eligibility...

CanadaEmployment and HR

In positive news for employers, in Styles v Alberta Investment Management Corporation, 2017 ABCA 1 [Styles], the Alberta Court of Appeal (ABCA) affirmed that an employee who does not meet a clear and well drafted condition of eligibility will not be entitled to a bonus payment during the period of notice of termination. The court rejected the trial decision findings that the employer had a duty to reasonably exercise its discretionary power to permit vesting under the plan documents and that the employee was entitled to a payment in lieu of bonus of $444,205.

Background

David Styles began his employment with Alberta Investment Management Corporation (AIMCo) in June 2010. In addition to his base salary and participation in AIMCo's annual bonus plan, Mr. Styles also participated in AIMCo's Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP), which gave him yearly performance-based "grants" that would vest at the end of a four-year performance period. The most recent version of the LTIP

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from