Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2014

Must Benefits Coverage Extend To Employees Over The Age Of 65?

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario recently released its decision in Kartna v. Toronto.

CanadaEmployment and HR

The  Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario recently released its decision in Kartna v. Toronto (City), dismissing an application that the termination of long-term disability (LTD) benefits at the age of 65 was discriminatory on the basis of age.

The Tribunal dismissed the application following a summary hearing on the basis that the application had no reasonable prospect of success.

Decision

The case involved an Applicant who had been receiving LTD benefits since April 2011. Consistent with the terms of the LTD plan, those benefits were terminated in September 2013 when the Applicant reached the age of 65.

The Applicant argued that a plan cutting off LTD benefits at age 65 had the effect of forcing an employee into retirement. Further, as mandatory retirement was discriminatory, the provisions of the ESA (referenced below) reflected an outdated and inequitable approach to retirement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from