Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JANUARY 2016

Is It Frustration Of Contract Or Discrimination?

Does an employee's three-year absence from work amount to frustration of contract; or, does it constitute wrongful dismissal and a breach of human rights legislation?

CanadaEmployment and HR

Does an employee's three-year absence from work amount to frustration of contract; or, does it constitute wrongful dismissal and a breach of human rights legislation?  The challenging issues at stake in this type of situation were raised in the recent case of Boucher v. Black & McDonald Ltd.

The plaintiff was a business development representative who worked for the defendant.  The defendant is involved with controlled heating, ventilation, HVAC and boilers.

The plaintiff went on a maternity leave in June 2010.  The maternity leave was followed by a medical leave which lasted until the fall of 2013.  In the interim, there were a number of dates of possible return to work.  Due to various circumstances, the plaintiff did not return.  However, in her evidence, it seemed clear that she felt by September 2013 that she would return to work before year end.  A graduated return to work was proposed to start on or about November 11, 2013.  However, the plaintiff was advised

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from