Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 DECEMBER 2009

Impact Of Information And Communication Technologies On The Labour Code's Anti-Scab Provisions

For some years now, the Internet has been changing our behaviour and way of functioning as a society. But has that revolution also had an impact on the scope of our laws? That is the question that arose in connection with two labour disputes, one at the Journal de Québec and the other at the Journal de Montréal

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Legislative Context

Since their adoption in 1977, the anti-strikebreaking provisions of the Quebec Labour Code have never prevented an employer from keeping its operations going by having them carried out by third parties, as long as the third parties are not doing work ordinarily done by the striking or locked out employees, in the establishment where the strike or lockout has been declared.1 This means that an employer that can maintain its operations from outside the establishment affected by a labour dispute will have an enormous advantage over one that cannot.

So, for example, an employer that owned a general store obviously could not contract out the store's operation to another establishment, whereas it would be relatively easy for an employer in the welding business to contract out its welding operations to an outside welding shop even if such a measure would usually result in reduced profits.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from