Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 APRIL 2012

Employee Non-Competition Covenants: No Place For Blue Pencils

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The recent decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in Veolia ES Industrial Services Inc v Brulé deals with the interpretation and enforceability of a non-compete clause in an employment agreement and the scope of an employee's fiduciary duties to a former employer.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Article by George Waggott and Daliana Coban, Student-at-Law

The recent decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in Veolia ES Industrial Services Inc v Brulé1 deals with the interpretation and enforceability of a non-compete clause in an employment agreement and the scope of an employee's fiduciary duties to a former employer.

The parties entered into a three-year employment agreement on January 1, 2004, which was subject to the employer's right to terminate the employment for cause or without cause upon payment of the compensation to which the employee was entitled until the end of the term. The employee also had the right to terminate the employment agreement by giving the employer 180 days notice.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from