Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 NOVEMBER 2017

Bonus Claims: Past Practice Gets A Boost

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

Craig Cunningham was an accomplished senior executive who was dismissed without cause after eight years service.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In many executive terminations, counsel operate under the flawed assumption that a lack of clear termination wording automatically results in a bonus obligation during the notice period. The recent Ontario decision in Cunningham v Design Filtration Microzone Inc., 2017 ONSC 5486 confirms that a more careful review of past practice may deny so-called "notice period bonus" claims. 

Craig Cunningham was an accomplished senior executive who was dismissed without cause after eight years service. He brought a wrongful dismissal case and was ultimately awarded 12 months notice. 

A contentious issue in the case was Cunningham's claim for bonus, which had two elements: bonus during year of termination, and bonus during the notice period.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from