Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MAY 2019

BC Supreme Court Denies Workplace Poisoning Claim For Constructive Dismissal

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

An employer must ensure that an employee's work environment is not so hostile that work becomes impossible or continued employment intolerable.

CanadaEmployment and HR

An employer must ensure that an employee's work environment is not so hostile that work becomes impossible or continued employment intolerable.1 An employee may claim constructive dismissal where an employer breaches this responsibility, and if successful, may be awarded pay in lieu of termination notice and, possibly, aggravated and punitive damages.

In the recent decision Baraty v Wellons Canada Corp.,2 the BC Supreme Court (the "Court") declined to find constructive dismissal on the facts, and in doing so, clarified employers' responsibility to maintain work environments free from "workplace poisoning".

Legal Framework

The leading Supreme Court of Canada case on the topic, Potter v New Brunswick Legal Aid Commission,3 identifies two "branches" of constructive dismissal.  The first branch focuses on whether a unilateral act by an employer, such as a demotion, substantially alters an employment contract such that an employee is effectively

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from