Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JULY 2013

B.C. Human Rights Tribunal Reminds Employees To Express Their Accommodation Needs

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In Crompton v. Coast 2000 Terminals, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal reminds employees that there is a fine line between an employer's duty to inquire about the accommodation needs of a disabled employee and an employee's duty to inform his employer that he requires accommodation in the first place.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In Crompton v. Coast 2000 Terminals, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal (the Tribunal) reminds employees that there is a fine line between an employer's duty to inquire about the accommodation needs of a disabled employee and an employee's duty to inform his employer that he requires accommodation in the first place.

The Facts of Crompton v. Coast 2000 Terminals

Greg Crompton worked in an executive capacity at Coast 2000 Terminals (Coast), Fraser River Terminals (FRT) and their predecessor companies for 29 years. In 2004, Crompton was president of FRT, and he was appointed as vice-president, operations, of Coast. In July 2007, Crompton suffered an injury that resulted in the loss of a portion of his foot. He returned to work full time and to his full range of duties in early 2008.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from