Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 SEPTEMBER 2017

Are Summary Judgment Applications Appropriate For Determining Reasonable Notice Periods In Alberta?

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

According to one master of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, the answer to that question is NO.

CanadaEmployment and HR

According to one master of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, the answer to that question is NO.

In Coffey v Nine Energy Canada Inc., 2017 ABQB 417, Master J. Farrington was faced with a summary judgment application in a wrongful dismissal case. The plaintiff, Mr. Coffey, was a long-time employee who was seeking, among other things, an increased reasonable notice period following his termination without cause. Among the issues raised by the defendant company was the jurisdiction of the master in chambers to assess damages.

In his analysis, Master Farrington reinforced the fact that masters in Alberta have no jurisdiction to try actions or to resolve disputed questions of fact where oral evidence is required, and that parties must generally show an "unassailable" case in order to be successful on a summary judgment application. Where he diverged from the conventional position in this area, however, was when he went on to consider the nature of summary judgment

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from