Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 NOVEMBER 2013

Accidental Discharges: The Duty To Notify

On October 17th, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-awaited decision in "Castonguay Blasting", commonly referred to as the fly-rock case.

CanadaEmployment and HR

On October 17th, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-awaited decision in Castonguay Blasting, commonly referred to as the fly-rock case. To summarize, Castonguay was doing some blasting work and rock was unexpectedly projected outside the work site, landing on someone's property and damaging a home and a vehicle. No one was hurt and there was no environmental damage. The contractor notified the site manager who notified the provincial ministry of transport and the ministry of labour. A month later, the ministry of transport mentioned the incident to the ministry of the environment which then charged Castonguay with the discharge of a contaminant in violation of the Ontario Environmental Protection Act (EPA) and for the offense of failing to report the discharge. At issue before the courts was whether a discharge that causes damage to property but not the environment must be reported. The Ontario Court of Justice acquitted Castonguay. The Supreme Court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from