Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 FEBRUARY 2010

Who Has The Say On Pay?

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

Recent high-profile corporate insolvencies and bailouts, particularly in the United States, have drawn international attention to the executive compensation practices of publicly traded companies.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Recent high-profile corporate insolvencies and bailouts, particularly in the United States, have drawn international attention to the executive compensation practices of publicly traded companies. While shareholder activists have been demanding for several years the right to an advisory shareholder vote, or say on pay, on the executive compensation programs, this movement recently has been successful in achieving binding or non-binding say-on-pay votes for public companies in the United Kingdom, Australia, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, France and Sweden.

Proponents of say on pay argue that such a mechanism will help curtail compensation practices that reward excessive risk taking and will better align executive and shareholder interests. Detractors question whether shareholders understand all of the facets of executive compensation and maintain that shareholder views will shackle a board's ability to attract and retain top talent. At least for now, say on pay is

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from