Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MAY 2016

Underwriters May Have Expertise But That Does Not Make Them "Experts"

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In the LBP Holdings v. Allied Nevada Gold Corp. decision released on April 27, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice refused to allow the underwriters of a secondary public offering...

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

In the LBP Holdings v. Allied Nevada Gold Corp. decision released on April 27, 2016, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice refused to allow the underwriters of a secondary public offering (SPO) to be added as defendants to a proposed statutory securities class action against the issuer in respect of statutory and unjust enrichment claims.

Among other things, the plaintiff argued that the underwriters were liable as "experts" within the meaning of Part XXIII.1 of the Ontario Securities Act (OSA). Justice Belobaba acknowledged that underwriters have professional expertise in the capital markets, but concluded that such expertise was not enough to expose them to liability as "experts" under Part XXIII.1 of the OSA.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from