Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MARCH 2013

Securities Regulators Propose Alternative Approaches To Defensive Tactics

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The Canadian Securities Administrators have recently published for comment the draft National Instrument 62-105 – Security Holder Rights Plans, a related companion policy and proposed consequential amendments to certain other instruments and policies.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Securities Regulators Propose Alternative Approaches To Defensive Tactics

On March 14, 2013, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) published for comment draft National Instrument 62-105 – Security Holder Rights Plans (NI 62-105), a related companion policy and proposed consequential amendments to certain other instruments and policies. On the same day, Quebec's Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), which is a member of the CSA, published for comment an alternative proposal in the form of a consultation paper entitled An Alternative Approach to Securities Regulators' Intervention in Defensive Tactics. The two draft proposals offer divergent approaches to the treatment of shareholder rights plans (poison pills) in unsolicited take-over bids. Moreover, the Quebec proposal goes further than that of the CSA, recommending fundamental changes to the regulation of defensive tactics generally in Canada, a matter that the CSA indicate is part of a broader and ongoing

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from