In the 2014 Bhasin v Hrynew case, the Supreme
Court of Canada clarified the law and recognized a legal principle
that imposes general duties of good faith and honest performance on
all parties to a contract.2 These duties exist
in addition to any obligations set out in the express terms of an
agreement and cannot be contracted out of. This article provides an
overview of the basic principles of the duty of honest performance
and sets out examples of how it can apply in the context of due
diligence performed as part of a land deal.
THE DUTY OF GOOD FAITH
Lawyers often refer to "the duty of good faith" to
describe the principles set out by the Supreme Court in
Bhasin. However, in the Bhasin decision the
Supreme Court actu- ally set out two separate concepts: a general
organizing principle of good faith, which underlays specific
situations where good faith duties were already recognized by the
law, and a narrower duty of honest performance of contrac-