Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 FEBRUARY 2016

Highly Anticipated Supreme Court Decision In Securities Class Action Trilogy Released

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

However, the court has the jurisdiction to grant "backdated" leave – an order nunc pro tunc – where the plaintiff is granted leave after the expiry of the limitation period but filed the leave motion prior to the expiry of the limitation period.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

In a case that has been anticipated as one of the top 5 corporate law decisions to watch for 2015 the Supreme Court of Canada held this morning that leave of the court to commence an action for secondary market misrepresentation under the Ontario Securities Act must be obtained within the prescribed three-year limitation period, and that the limitation period for obtaining leave is not tolled in circumstances where a class proceeding has been commenced. However, the court has the jurisdiction to grant "backdated" leave – an order nunc pro tunc – where the plaintiff is granted leave after the expiry of the limitation period but filed the leave motion prior to the expiry of the limitation period. The decision by a heavily divided Court came in a trilogy of cases – Green v. CIBC, Silver v. IMAX, and Celestica v. Millwright Regional Council of Ontario Pension Trust Fund – reported as CIBC v. Green ("CIBC").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from