Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 APRIL 2025

Great Hill Clauses: Private M&A Meets Solicitor-Client Privilege

Deal terms in private M&A are constantly evolving. An example is the "Great Hill clause", the subject of the recent ruling in Ellis Packaging and one of the new deal points...

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Overview and Key Takeaways

Deal terms in private M&A are constantly evolving. An example is the "Great Hill clause", the subject of the recent ruling in Ellis Packaging1 and one of the new deal points featured in the 2025 ABA Canadian Private Target M&A Deal Point Study (the ABA Study).2 Ellis Packaging is now the third Canadian decision on Great Hill clauses, and so is notable for both M&A lawyers and commercial litigators.

The term Great Hill clause, which derives its name from a 2013 Delaware ruling,3 addresses post-closing control over pre-closing privileged communications between the target and legal counsel. Specifically, the clause limits the ability of the buyer, in connection with a post-closing claim, to rely on pre-closing privileged communications between the target and legal counsel.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from