Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 SEPTEMBER 2013

CSA Provides Update On Review Of Proxy Voting Infrastructure

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

In June 2012, the Canadian Securities Administrators sought comments from market participants on Consultation Paper 25-401 Potential Regulation of Proxy Advisory Firms.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

In June 2012, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) sought comments from market participants on Consultation Paper 25-401 Potential Regulation of Proxy Advisory Firms (Consultation Paper). The CSA has provided an update on the comments it has received on the Consultation Paper.

Of concern to the CSA is the integrity of the proxy voting system, in particular its transparency, accuracy and the potential for conflicts of interest.

The comments received show that opinions are generally divided between two camps: issuers, issuer related associations and law firms in one camp, and institutional investors and related associations in the other.

Issuers were of the opinion that while proxy advisory firms are important, they expressed concern over the influence such firms may have on the voting patterns of institutional investors; whereas institutional investors saw proxy advisory firms as useful and cost effective and the institutional investors noted that they did

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from