Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 NOVEMBER 2013

A Question Of Transparency: Lululemon Athletica Inc.

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The incident serves as a helpful reminder that if such an occurrence can befall this "retail darling" it is all the more important that companies exercise sound judgment and consult appropriately regarding their disclosure obligations.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

It is a pioneer in the market for technical athletic apparel–in particular clothing geared towards yoga–and styles itself as a retailer with deep ties to local communities. So how did Lululemon Athletica Inc. find itself at the center of a class action lawsuit that alleges the company made materially false and misleading statements and omissions in connection with a product recall? What can other public companies take from this incident and what lessons does it provide about the importance of continuous disclosure in securities regulation?

SHEER PANTS AND ALLEGATIONS OF OPAQUE DISCLOSURE

On March 18, 2013 Lululemon Athletica Inc. ("Lululemon") issued a press release advising that certain shipments of black luon pants did not meet the company's "very high standards" and that the resulting product recall would have a "significant impact" on financial results. The press release stated that while the ingredients, weight and longevity of the pants remained the same,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from