Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2013

CARF – Stock Option Plan

Souza, Schneider, Pugliese e Sztokfisz Advogados
Explore more from Souza, Schneider, Pugliese e Sztokfisz Advogados

The Administrative Council of Tax Appeals – CARF, through its 2nd Section and in the last meeting held, judged the first two Stock Option cases, which examined whether the assessment for the non-collection of the social security contribution, pursuant to article 22, III, of Law no. 8,212/91, was correct when considering stock option plans as having a remuneration nature.

BrazilTax
Igor Nascimento De Souza
Igor Nascimento De Souza
Flavio Eduardo S. De Carvalho
Flavio Eduardo S. De Carvalho
Viviane Faulhaber Dutra
Viviane Faulhaber Dutra

The Administrative Council of Tax Appeals – CARF, through its 2nd Section and in the last meeting held, judged the first two Stock Option cases, which examined whether the assessment for the non-collection of the social security contribution, pursuant to article 22, III, of Law no. 8,212/91, was correct when considering stock option plans as having a remuneration nature.

In his defense, the taxpayer in both cases claimed that the stock option plan does not have a remuneration nature, since it is included in contract law, presenting an option for and a need of payment when exercising the option right. Moreover, he stated that the plan meets the volunteer condition and market risk, meaning it is not a case of remuneration of employees, but rather a commercial contract.1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from