Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 SEPTEMBER 2009

Engaging In Building Contracts With Tenants

This case has potential consequences for builders with respect to receiving payment for works undertaken on behalf of tenants of commercial buildings.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

This case has potential consequences for builders with respect to receiving payment for works undertaken on behalf of tenants of commercial buildings.

In 1997 Bowen Investments, owner of a unique commercial building in Melbourne, discovered that its corporate tenant Tabcorp had engaged its own architect, internal designer and contractors to renovate the premises. The contractors jack-hammered and filled with debris the building's foyer. The original foyer featured San Francisco Green Granite and Sequence and Matched Crown Coat American Cherry.

Tabcorp had agreed in the lease not to make any substantial alteration or addition to the premises without the prior consent of Bowen Investments. Tabcorp had also agreed in the lease to make good any damage incurred to the premises. Bowen Investments had not given prior consent to the alterations to the foyer, and Tabcorp refused to make good the damage it caused. The estimated cost of restoring the premises was $1.38

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from