Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 DECEMBER 2020

Climate change: are major infrastructure contracts fit for purpose?

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Given the risks of climate change, express language should clarify liability under the fit for purpose warranty.

AustraliaReal Estate and Construction

As of late 2020, we continue to work through the dislocation of COVID-19 across all sectors of the economy, including the major projects sector. Despite regulating complex billion dollar infrastructure with design lives of up to 100 years, in most part the contracts for these projects were negotiated with little consideration of the possibility of a global pandemic.

As a consequence, the parties bound by these contracts are left to ponder, argue and dispute over where the disruption, delay and cost consequences of COVID-19 should fall, bound by the terms they have agreed, however inadequate or unintended.

Unsatisfactory as that all may be, at least the parties come to the issue plausibly protesting that they could not have anticipated COVID-19 and so they are not at fault in failing to provide for it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from