Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2025

Facial Recognition In Retail: Privacy Lessons From The Kmart Decision

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Valuable guidance for retailers using FRT or other equivalent technologies on their premises.

AustraliaPrivacy

The Privacy Commissioner has handed down her decision following an investigation into Kmart's use of facial recognition technology (FRT), finding that the retailer collected sensitive biometric data from store visitors without adequate consent. The decision follows an earlier investigation into Bunnings, also part of the Wesfarmers stable, concerning its use of FRT.

Between June 2020 and July 2022, Kmart trialled FRT in 28 stores in an attempt to identify those committing refund fraud. The Commissioner found that:

  • Kmart did not have adequate consent from visitors to collect their personal and sensitive information, including biometric facial images
  • without the required consent, no applicable exception to the collection and use of the information applied under the Privacy Act

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from